In jujitsu, you don’t overpower your opponent. You redirect their momentum until they collapse under their own force. That’s precisely what AI did to Go-to-Market (GTM). It didn’t break the funnel. It let the funnel break itself.
By following GTM’s logic — volume over value, correlation over causation — AI made the system irrelevant without needing to attack it.
The old GTM stance: Visibility, volume and velocity
For the past two decades, GTM strategies have been built on this foundation:
- SEO and content marketing to dominate keywords.
- Multi-touch attribution to track clicks and impressions.
- Funnel metrics as a proxy for intent and effectiveness.
- Engagement scores to identify “buyers.”
It was a world built on correlation. If something happened after marketing touched it, we claimed partial credit. If a blog post ranked high, we poured fuel on it. If a persona clicked three emails, we escalated the lead.
GTM operated like a factory: The more content we pushed, the more MQLs we scored and the more credit we took. But this model had a fatal flaw — it couldn’t distinguish between noise, impact, visibility and value. It worked for a while because buyers didn’t have better options.
Then, AI search arrived — and flipped the entire system.
Dig deeper: The hard truth about what AI will do to GTM
The AI reversal: Redirection, not resistance
AI didn’t argue with GTM. It didn’t try to dismantle your funnel, your SDR cadence or your lead score. It ignored them.
LLMs like ChatGPT, Perplexity and Google’s AI Overviews don’t care how many blog posts you’ve written. They don’t track backlinks or keyword density. They don’t follow your funnel.
- They use semantic retrieval, not keyword matching.
- They prioritize trust and clarity, not recency or reach.
- They generate answers, not lead capture forms.
In other words, AI performed a jujitsu move:
- It stepped aside.
- It let GTM overextend.
- And it redirected momentum into collapse.
The entire mechanism of traditional GTM became a vulnerability the moment buyers could bypass it with a better answer.
The strategic leverage of AI search
AI search replaces ranking with retrievability. Instead of rewarding:
- Volume, it rewards signal density.
- Engagement tricks, it rewards semantic coherence.
- Correlative touchpoints, it rewards causal clarity.
This new system asks:
- “Does this content directly answer the question?”
- “Is it consistent with high-authority sources?”
- “Is it factually structured and trustworthy enough to be cited?”
If not? You disappear, regardless of how much traffic you paid for.
AI search isn’t a war for the top spot. It’s a filtration system where only the most relevant and reliable inputs survive. That makes GTM teams invisible by default unless they can produce content that:
- Is findable by vector search.
- Is understandable by a model.
- Is trustworthy enough to be cited or synthesized.
Dig deeper: A 3-step guide to unlocking marketing ROI with causal AI
GTM’s counterforce becomes its undoing
Let’s walk the mat together:
| GTM assumption | AI’s jujitsu reversal |
|---|---|
| “More content = more results” | AI ignores content that’s duplicative or low-signal. |
| “High rankings = high intent” | Rankings are gone. Retrieval is contextual. |
| “Attribution tells us what works” | AI flattens correlative paths and looks for causation. |
| “Funnel stages = buyer journey” | AI meets the buyer exactly where they are—no nurture needed. |
| “Engagement proves value” | AI doesn’t care about likes. It cares about layered proof. |
In short, GTM scaled tactics optimized for the wrong medium. AI changes the medium. The tactics turn inward and collapse. You don’t win a jujitsu match by punching harder. You win by making the other person fall on their own punch.
How to rebuild in the age of causal GTM
If AI invalidated the old rules, what replaces them? The answer is causal GTM — a strategy built on:
- Retrievability: Are you present in the semantic landscape of the buyer’s question?
- Trustworthiness: Is your content factually consistent and sourced?
- Causal relevance: Can you prove that what you do moves the business needle?
- Outcome framing: Are you solving for business impact, not funnel stage?
New mandates
- Write for synthesis, not search: Structure content so an AI can quote you, not just find you.
- Build a retrievability graph: Own the questions you want to be the answer to.
- Ditch attribution, adopt calibration: Causally link actions to outcomes, even with time lag.
- Train for strategic interlock: GTM must interlace with finance, product and ops — not just scale itself.
The final throw
AI didn’t destroy the traditional GTM machine. It was redirected into irrelevance by a force it didn’t even see coming. AI didn’t need to attack. It just let the system exhaust itself.
The answer isn’t to fight harder but to learn the leverage. The new GTM leaders will be:
- Less about tactics and more about truth.
- Less about filling the funnel and more about flowing with the buyer.
- Less about volume and more about causality, clarity and context.
AI flipped the funnel. Now you either flip your GTM — or fall with it.l. Now you either flip your GTM — or fall with it.
The post How AI flipped the funnel and made GTM tactics obsolete appeared first on MarTech.